going live
this blog is going live, this wednesday, the 19th day of may, in the year of our Lord, two thousand four. no expenses spared, much pomp and circumstance.
i'm still working out some kinks with this and eventually trying to take this mundane layout that probably everybody and there mother, sister, brother and grandma have used for their blogspot, a little touch here and there to make it truly sha-friendly.
so glad that chris did join me last night and it's a shame spab bailed at the last minute. but no matter, it was good to get some time with chris and finding out how things are really going with him these days. big laughs when he told me that he's auditioning tonight for a reggae band which uses various percussionists ... he'd be the main drums. he also had great news from a pseudo-friend in nashville who called to tell him he'd be willing to put chris's name out for feelers with area A&R reps. you never know how those things will go. he and matt have planned a trip to nashville in august and jason insists he'll introduce them to the word records president, but we'll see if that actually happens.
our theology on tap discussion last night has still left many things on my mind. one of our discussions was about the inerrancy of the Bible. apparently someone on sunday stated that they believed the Bible to be inerrant in it's depiction of God's character, but with some errors in it's description of man. the example given was not specific -- something along the lines of a particular person listed HERE as being married to so-and-so, yet listed THERE as being married to so-and-so2. my thought process is that this is a dangerous line of thinking. stating that one part of the Bible is inerrant and another part is errant essentially makes it overall a book of pseudo-falsehoods.
we had fascinating convos on legalism and on how some people perceive a dual God, one of the OT and one of the NT. needless to say i recognize i have much more to learn in these areas, but that's what i like about vintage. it's a place to question, grow, learn, glean and really seek.
i'm still working out some kinks with this and eventually trying to take this mundane layout that probably everybody and there mother, sister, brother and grandma have used for their blogspot, a little touch here and there to make it truly sha-friendly.
so glad that chris did join me last night and it's a shame spab bailed at the last minute. but no matter, it was good to get some time with chris and finding out how things are really going with him these days. big laughs when he told me that he's auditioning tonight for a reggae band which uses various percussionists ... he'd be the main drums. he also had great news from a pseudo-friend in nashville who called to tell him he'd be willing to put chris's name out for feelers with area A&R reps. you never know how those things will go. he and matt have planned a trip to nashville in august and jason insists he'll introduce them to the word records president, but we'll see if that actually happens.
our theology on tap discussion last night has still left many things on my mind. one of our discussions was about the inerrancy of the Bible. apparently someone on sunday stated that they believed the Bible to be inerrant in it's depiction of God's character, but with some errors in it's description of man. the example given was not specific -- something along the lines of a particular person listed HERE as being married to so-and-so, yet listed THERE as being married to so-and-so2. my thought process is that this is a dangerous line of thinking. stating that one part of the Bible is inerrant and another part is errant essentially makes it overall a book of pseudo-falsehoods.
we had fascinating convos on legalism and on how some people perceive a dual God, one of the OT and one of the NT. needless to say i recognize i have much more to learn in these areas, but that's what i like about vintage. it's a place to question, grow, learn, glean and really seek.
This entry was posted
on 19 May 2004 at 5/19/2004 11:02:00 AM.
You can skip to the end and leave a response.
First and foremost, where's the merry-go-round?
Can't wait to see what you do with the place. The dual God thing, can you expound. God is God of course, butu I think that His work on and interaction with the world is different now then it was in the OT. Guess that's it.
Jim, HT on relevant
like the new look, sha.
thanks, casey! any tips on adding haloscan commenting? i'm still working out kinks with that comment coding.
jim, i'll try to remember to expand a bit in the LL on that concept on some people's assumption of a duality with God. just remind me.
hm...you'd have to ask shua about haloscan.
» Post a Comment